[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Christian Lohmaier-3 Christian Lohmaier-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Hi *,

for the upcoming new version 5.2.0 the builds for alpha1 are now
available on pre-releases. (Mac builds still pending)

It is a LibreOfficeDev build, meaning that it won't replace your
stable version of LibreOffice, but can be installed alongside
LibreOffice 5.1

Also note that while the build is also a key-ID build for translators,
neither string nor feature freeze has happened yet

See

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.2#5.2.0_release

for the complete schedule.

Grab the builds from here here:

 http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/


The list of fixed bugs relative to 5.1.3 rc1 is here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-master-release-5.2.0.0.alpha1.log

So playing with the areas touched there also greatly appreciated  -
and validation that those bugs are really fixed.

Thanks a lot for your help,
Christian
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
V Stuart Foote V Stuart Foote
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

@Cloph, *

Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but seems the Windows builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of tdf#99285.

FatalError - Extension Manager

Sorry...

Stuart
Christian Lohmaier-3 Christian Lohmaier-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:07 AM, V Stuart Foote <[hidden email]> wrote:
> @Cloph, *
>
> Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but seems the Windows
> builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of
> tdf#99285 <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258>  .

Well, so far only you could reproduce...

ciao
Christian
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
m.a.riosv m.a.riosv
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

El 22/04/16 a las 10:40, Christian Lohmaier escribió:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:07 AM, V Stuart Foote [hidden email] wrote:
>> @Cloph, *
>>
>> Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but seems the Windows
>> builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of
>> tdf#99285 <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258>  .
>
> Well, so far only you could reproduce...

I can reproduce with 5.2x86 pre-release.
Comment in the bug report. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258#c9

Now we are two. :)

Miguel Ángel.

>
> ciao
> Christian


_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

m.a.riosv wrote
El 22/04/16 a las 10:40, Christian Lohmaier escribió:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:07 AM, V Stuart Foote [hidden email] wrote:
>> Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but  seems the Windows
>> builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging issue of
>> tdf#99285
>> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258
>
>Well, so far only you could reproduce...
   
    I can reproduce with 5.2x86 pre-release.
    Comment in the bug report.
    https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258#c9 
   
    Now we are two. :)
 
Make it 3.

Version Alpha does not work under Windows 10 x64

I tested with both x86 and x64, installed in parallel with SI GUI and standard install.
In all situations LO fails with the same error screen posted by Stuart.

It does however run correctly under Win 7 Pro x64 SP1
Florian Reisinger Florian Reisinger
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which version is the baseline ATM...
Yours,
Florian


Pedro <[hidden email]> schrieb am Sa., 23. Apr. 2016 02:16:
m.a.riosv wrote
> El 22/04/16 a las 10:40, Christian Lohmaier escribió:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:07 AM, V Stuart Foote [hidden email] wrote:
>>> Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but  seems the
>>> Windows
>>> builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by packaging
>>> issue of
>>> tdf#99285
>>> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258
>>
>>Well, so far only you could reproduce...
>
>     I can reproduce with 5.2x86 pre-release.
>     Comment in the bug report.
>     https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258#c9
>
>     Now we are two. :)
>

Make it 3.

Version Alpha does not work under Windows 10 x64

I tested with both x86 and x64, installed in parallel with SI GUI and
standard install.
In all situations LO fails with the same error screen posted by Stuart.

It does however run correctly under Win 7 Pro x64 SP1




--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOfficeDev-5-2-0-alpha1-test-builds-available-tp4181683p4181738.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Hi Florian

Long time no see ;)

Florian Reisinger wrote
Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which
version is the baseline ATM...
I sincerely don't know. I never had to worry about that in any software (including LibreOffice).
If the correct MSVC libraries are not included in Win 10 then they need to be packaged with the LO installer, right?

I can manually install any MSVC version to check if that solves the problem. Which is the expected version?

Regards,
Pedro
V Stuart Foote V Stuart Foote
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

This post was updated on .
Pedro wrote
Hi Florian

Long time no see ;)

Florian Reisinger wrote
Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which
version is the baseline ATM...
I sincerely don't know. I never had to worry about that in any software (including LibreOffice).
If the correct MSVC libraries are not included in Win 10 then they need to be packaged with the LO installer, right?

I can manually install any MSVC version to check if that solves the problem. Which is the expected version?

Regards,
Pedro
The Visual Studio baseline remains 2013 at 5.2, and Christian's TB62 and release builds, Kendy's TB39 and Thorsten's TB42 all bundle the 2103 MS VC++ redistributable runtimes in the appropriate 32bit/64bit flavor.

But when testing and performing an "in parallel"  /a administrative installation, e.g. using the SI GUI, does not install the VC++ runtimes. The runtimes are packaged with the build in the System folder, but they are only installed with a full installation.

So as FLorian notes the appropriate runtimes *must* be installed, but are more often already present on a system.

Should you need the runtimes to work with /a administrative parallel installs of earlier releases they are available from Microsoft at these links:

For VS 2013 for 5.y.z
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40784

For VS 2012 for later 4.y.z builds
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679

For VS 2010  for builds -> 3.6
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26999

For VS 2015 (ongoing testing)
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

Hi Stuart

Thank you for the detailed information.

So this is clearly not the problem since, as I mentioned, "I tested with both x86 and x64, installed in parallel with SI GUI and standard install."

In any case the PC where I tested the Alpha build has version 5.1.3.1 installed and running so any needed libraries are already there.

This is definitely a bug (and sadly enough you had reported this 10 days ago...)