Non-debug Windows daily builds???

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
18 messages Options
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Non-debug Windows daily builds???

Hi all

Two questions:

1) Tinderbox 6 stopped producing non-debug Windows daily builds for Master branch. Is this deliberate?

2) There are 43 registered tinderboxes (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox) . Isn't it possible that at least one of these uploads Windows daily builds for Master branch? E.g. Tinderbox 39 is producing daily builds from Master (http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html) but there is no corresponding download folder (http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/)
Petr Mladek Petr Mladek
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds???

Pedro píše v St 07. 08. 2013 v 02:36 -0700:
> Hi all
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Tinderbox 6 stopped producing non-debug Windows daily builds for Master
> branch. Is this deliberate?

Yes, this is on purpose. We want to have a build with debugging symbols,
so people could provide backtraces.

> 2) There are 43 registered tinderboxes
> (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox) . Isn't it
> possible that at least one of these uploads Windows daily builds for Master
> branch? E.g. Tinderbox 39 is producing daily builds from Master
> (http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html) but there is no
> corresponding download folder
> (http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/)

Kendy, would be possible to enable uploading the daily builds from
Win-X86@39, please?

Well, this would solve only master. I do not see any really working
Windows tinderbox for the 4-0 and 4-1 branches. I guess that it is
because Markus, Cloph, and Thorsten are still fighting with the new
hardware?


Best Regards,
Petr


PS: Should you have such complains, it is better to send them to the
developer mailing list which is more actively monitored by the
tinderboxes maintainers.

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds???

Hi Petr

Petr Mladek wrote
Yes, this is on purpose. We want to have a build with debugging symbols,
so people could provide backtraces.
Ok. Whatever that means :)

Petr Mladek wrote
Kendy, would be possible to enable uploading the daily builds from
Win-X86@39, please?

Well, this would solve only master. I do not see any really working
Windows tinderbox for the 4-0 and 4-1 branches. I guess that it is
because Markus, Cloph, and Thorsten are still fighting with the new
hardware?
Yes, that is true. There aren't any dailies of any branch except for the master debug...
Thank you for passing the message around.

Petr Mladek wrote
PS: Should you have such complains, it is better to send them to the
developer mailing list which is more actively monitored by the
tinderboxes maintainers.
Thanks, but no thanks. I'd rather be ignored on the QA list (as usual) than insulted on the Dev list ;)

Cheers,
Pedro
Jan Holesovsky Jan Holesovsky
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by Petr Mladek
Hi Petr, all,

Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 08. 2013 v 18:20 +0200:

> Kendy, would be possible to enable uploading the daily builds from
> Win-X86@39, please?

Done now:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/

Should be quite reliable, the box has been stable for the last month
[since its introduction :-)]

Regards,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
ape ape
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

This post was updated on .
Hi Kendy!
Created big problems for testers program for Windows XP (my OS – Win_XP_64-bit_sp2) now:
1. "Master_@39" (master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi) does not start. LibreOffice reports that MSVCR-2012 libraries are not found.
2. “Master_@42" (ID: 63b86dfdf84edfca0b49d97687e4759dd8d8efff; time: 2013-08-17_22.48.29) runs at the second attempt. Every start accompanied by sending bug reports to Microsoft (an attachment).
Regards, ape
76cc_appcompat.txt
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi Kendy, all

For some odd reason this message by ape hasn't been accepted.

I can confirm that build master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some MSVC dlls.

I can also confirm that the build libo-master~2013-08-17_22.48.29_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from Tinderbox 42 crashes on start.

This would be the perfect opportunity to run a debug build but the latest available is from the 13th of August, so it's probably not worth running it to check today's bugs?

ape wrote
Hi Kendy!
Created big problems for testers program for Windows XP (my OS – Win_XP_64-bit_sp2) now:
1. "Master_@39" (master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi) does not start. LibreOffice reports that MSVCR-2012 libraries are not found.
2. “Master_@42" (ID: 63b86dfdf84edfca0b49d97687e4759dd8d8efff; time: 2013-08-17_22.48.29) runs at the second attempt. Every start accompanied by sending bug reports to Microsoft (an attachment).
Regards, ape
76cc_appcompat.txt
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi Kendy, Petr, all

<quote author="Pedro">
This would be the perfect opportunity to run a debug build but the latest available is from the 13th of August, so it's probably not worth running it to check today's bugs?
ape wrote
The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe662fe0d80601049f015d8ac
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-08-13_21:26:14)

worked correctly so it won't help in solving the problems that were added posteriorly (except that now you know that it did work on the 13th).

Two more comments:

1) Please include in each daily build folder for Tinderboxes 39 and 42 a text file with details on the build like
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@6-debug/2013-08-13_21.26.14/master~2013-08-13_21.26.14_build_info.txt

2) Would it be possible to add some checksum information in the txt file? Something like the first section of
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/4.1.0/win/x86/LibreOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86.msi.mirrorlist
Or maybe on a separate file?

Cheers,
Pedro
ape ape
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by Pedro
I have some computers: from the "Core i3-2130" to "Xeon e3-1230v2". But I use "Windows_XP_64-bit" as the primary operating system and "*buntu\Debian_amd64 with LXDE or Mate" as educational and auxiliary operating systems.
The situation is now: I don’t have the opportunity to participate in the LibO-4.2.0.0.+’s test.
Is this situation nice for leading engineers of the project?
Jan Holesovsky Jan Holesovsky
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by Pedro
Hi Pedro,

Pedro píše v Ne 18. 08. 2013 v 13:31 -0700:

> I can confirm that build
> master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
> tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some
> MSVC dlls.

I suppose it is due to a new MSVC; but should be fixable anyway - any
chance you can create a 4.2 MAB for that?

> I can also confirm that the build
> libo-master~2013-08-17_22.48.29_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
> Tinderbox 42 crashes on start.

No idea - Thorsten?

All the best,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi Kendy

Jan Holesovsky wrote
> I can confirm that build
> master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
> tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some
> MSVC dlls.
I could but it seems to me that this is a problem specific to Tinderbox 39? Does it make sense to consider this a 4.2 MAB when it happens in a single machine?

One request: can someone rename/delete Tinderboxes from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/?

Tinderbox Win_X86@42 should be Win_x86@42 (the x in lowercase) and Tinderboxes 6 (not debug), 7 and 16 folders should be removed since they are not producing any master builds.

Cheers,
Pedro
Thorsten Behrens Thorsten Behrens
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by Jan Holesovsky
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > I can also confirm that the build
> > libo-master~2013-08-17_22.48.29_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
> > Tinderbox 42 crashes on start.
>
> No idea - Thorsten?
>
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-X86@42/2013-08-19_23.11.46/
e.g. works just fine here. In general, of course, master can be broken
(and then fixed again) at any given time... ;)

If that still fails for you, some more input appreciated
(e.g. backtrace, what libs are missing, etc).

HTH,

-- Thorsten

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

signature.asc (853 bytes) Download Attachment
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi Thorsten, all

Thorsten Behrens wrote
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-X86@42/2013-08-19_23.11.46/
e.g. works just fine here. In general, of course, master can be broken
(and then fixed again) at any given time... ;)

If that still fails for you, some more input appreciated
(e.g. backtrace, what libs are missing, etc).
None of the builds from tinderbox 39 and 42 works under Windows XP.

Please read the previous emails in this thread
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-td4069175.html

I will be glad to run a debug build when there is a new one.

Cheers,
Pedro
Thorsten Behrens Thorsten Behrens
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Pedro wrote:
> None of the builds from tinderbox 39 and 42 works under Windows XP.
>
Sure sure, that is I suppose a general fix. Was just trying to make
sure my box is not utterly broken by always doling out crashing
builds. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

signature.asc (853 bytes) Download Attachment
Florian Reisinger Florian Reisinger
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by ape
Hi,

For Ubuntu there is a PPA, if you are on Beta, or the the bibisect repo:
http://flosmind.wordpress.com/libreoffice-bisecting/

Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger

Am 19.08.2013 um 12:05 schrieb ape <[hidden email]>:

I have some computers: from the "Core i3-2130" to "Xeon e3-1230v2". But I use
"Windows_XP_64-bit" as the primary operating system and "*buntu\Debian_amd64
with LXDE or Mate" as educational and auxiliary operating systems.
The situation is now: I don’t have the opportunity to participate in the
LibO-4.2.0.0.+’s test.
Is this situation nice for leading engineers of the project?




--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070588.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
ape ape
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi, Florian!

Thank you for your reply and advice.
 Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux), because I use LibreOffice by TDF only.

ape
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by Pedro
Hi Kendy, Thorsten, all

Pedro wrote
The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe662fe0d80601049f015d8ac
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-08-13_21:26:14)

worked correctly so it won't help in solving the problems that were added posteriorly (except that now you know that it did work on the 13th).
Update: the debug build from the 21st works correctly under Windows XP (thank you whoever runs this Tinderbox),
It is quite obvious that something is missing from the builds from Tinderbox @39 and @42

Nevertheless the information in the About box is broken again (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: e8c0708ee9d0c01cbe0bdcb38ac14e34bdceef32)... It lost the third line again (see above).

How is this possible that it works every other release? Why is this feature so unstable???
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58034

Can someone also take a look at the following suggestions/requests or should I submit a separate Bug report for each item?

Pedro wrote
Two more comments:

1) Please include in each daily build folder for Tinderboxes 39 and 42 a text file with details on the build like
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@6-debug/2013-08-13_21.26.14/master~2013-08-13_21.26.14_build_info.txt

2) Would it be possible to add some checksum information in the txt file? Something like the first section of
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/4.1.0/win/x86/LibreOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86.msi.mirrorlist
Or maybe on a separate file?
Pedro wrote
One request: can someone rename/delete Tinderboxes from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/?

Tinderbox Win_X86@42 should be Win_x86@42 (the x in lowercase) and Tinderboxes 6 (not debug), 7 and 16 folders should be removed since they are not producing any master builds.
Regards,
Pedro
Michael Stahl-2 Michael Stahl-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

In reply to this post by ape
On 21/08/13 19:39, ape wrote:
>  Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux),
> because I use LibreOffice by TDF only.

why RPM based Linux?  it's easily possible to install the RPM packages
on any Linux, the only thing that does not work is system integration
(menu entries and mime-type associations), which is not a problem if you
start it from command line; also it is easily possible to have multiple
versions installed side by side.

just use the install script attached here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2011-November/000393.html
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
ape ape
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi, Michael!
Thanks for the tip. I guessed that this can be done, when compared extracted DEB and RPM archives in Windows. But I was not sure that it is correct.
ape