Re: installation of LO35; removal of LO33 required?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
nabbler nabbler
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: installation of LO35; removal of LO33 required?

> --- On Wed, 23/5/12, Pedro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> From: Pedro <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: installation of LO35; removal oy LO33
> required?
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Wednesday, 23 May, 2012, 10:06
>
>
> e-letter wrote
>>
>> Where is the report within QA that shows LO35 passed standard quality
>> tests?
>>
>
> Does this exist?
>
See: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2012-May/001740.html

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [hidden email]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Pedro Pedro
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: installation of LO35; removal of LO33 required?

e-letter wrote
>> Where is the report within QA that shows LO35 passed standard quality
>> tests?
>>
>
> Does this exist?
>
See: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2012-May/001740.html
I'm aware of litmus and the upcoming moztrap. But AFAIK there is no regular "standard quality test".

Even if a given release fails any future test it will not be stopped (unless it contains what the Devs call a Blocker...). The current procedure is that it will still be released and the bug will eventually be fixed on a future release.

It's the time based release model used by Mozilla and Ubuntu
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan