[libreoffice-l10n] New string for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Petr Mladek Petr Mladek
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[libreoffice-l10n] New string for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209

Hi,

Kohei nominated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 as a
LibO blocker bug. It would need to translate one more string?

Would you consider it as a blocker?
Should I add it to the lo-build.pot file?
How long would it block the release until we get translations?

My opinion is that we should update the .pot file and the pootle server
to allow active l10n team to have it fixed. Though, we should not block
the release because of this.



Best Regards,
Petr


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email]
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Andras Timar Andras Timar
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: New string for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209

2010.12.08. 12:01 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:

> Hi,
>
> Kohei nominated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 as a
> LibO blocker bug. It would need to translate one more string?
>
> Would you consider it as a blocker?
> Should I add it to the lo-build.pot file?
> How long would it block the release until we get translations?
>
> My opinion is that we should update the .pot file and the pootle server
> to allow active l10n team to have it fixed. Though, we should not block
> the release because of this.
>

This is not the first time.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31817 also introduced a
string change 3 days ago and I updated the .pot file.

IMHO it is not a blocker, many translations are still in progress
anyway. And if this string was untranslated, it would not be a regression.

Regards,
Andras

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email]
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Kohei Yoshida-2 Kohei Yoshida-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: New string for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:22 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:

> 2010.12.08. 12:01 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kohei nominated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 as a
> > LibO blocker bug. It would need to translate one more string?
> >
> > Would you consider it as a blocker?
> > Should I add it to the lo-build.pot file?
> > How long would it block the release until we get translations?
> >
> > My opinion is that we should update the .pot file and the pootle server
> > to allow active l10n team to have it fixed. Though, we should not block
> > the release because of this.
> >
>
> This is not the first time.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31817 also introduced a
> string change 3 days ago and I updated the .pot file.
>
> IMHO it is not a blocker, many translations are still in progress
> anyway. And if this string was untranslated, it would not be a regression.

Yup, I agree with Andras.  Not a blocker but worth doing for 3.3.

BTW, I just pushed the change to the 3.3 branch with Caolan's sign-off.

Kohei

--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<[hidden email]>


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email]
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***